Given are the two layouts delineating two different common types of workplaces in two countries: Japan and America.
Remarkably, the arrangement of occupation in Japan and America is unsimilar. Besides, the shared place style is more attractive for the Japanese whereas the Americans dignify individualism by owning a private desk at their workplace.
In Japan, the setting of their workplace is uncomplicated. The desks are set up together to form 2 large areas, and each of them is overseen by a section manager. Heading to the top north of the room, there is a huge place for the general manager where the supervisors can monitor their subordinates. There is only one window behind the desk of the general manager.
The American office, nevertheless, contains two windows stretching across nearly the whole wall on both sides. Along the east side of the workplace, the two-section managers and the general manager are arranged respectively. There are 8 personal semi-closed working stations in the center of the office where workers from one section can intermingle with workers from another. On the west, it is equipped with facilities such as a printer copier, a storage room and two conference rooms.
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities Summarize the information by selectin and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people work for the same organization all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organizations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The picture shows the process of making wool Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the two layouts delineating two differe...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, nevertheless, so, whereas, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1014.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17346938776 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93640068444 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622448979592 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.9819995727 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1818181818 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8181818182 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27272727273 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0540640456336 0.215688989381 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0173153546784 0.103423049105 17% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0241707060091 0.0843802449381 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0302709478757 0.15604864568 19% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0221433855606 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.