Given is the line graph delineating the proportion of worldwide citizens receiving news in 4 distinct ways in a 25-year period, commencing from 1995 to 2020 and giving predictions for the next 5 years.
It is perceptible that the rate of people reaching news by TV, Newspaper and Radio still shares a slumping pattern while the opposite is likely to be true for the rest - internet.
From 1995 to 2020, the proportion of news-takers by television, newspaper as well as radio diminished over the years. Specifically, the rate of people accessing news from television from the highest rate of 70% moderated to somewhere at 55% in 2020. Likewise, the number of people using newspaper and radio in the rate started at approximately 58% and 52% before plummeting at nearly 22% and 30% respectively. Meanwhile people in 1995 barely used the internet, they swelled in rate in the vicinity of 30% in 2010 and made a remarkable rush to second place in the rank chart of the most accessors to news in 4 different categories.
For the year in the future, the projections for the rate of citizens gaining news from 4 sources in the future register a moderate fluctuation in position. To be more accurate, the netizens approaching news is supposed to have by far the highest rate, followed by a plateau in rank of TV, newspaper and radio with 50%, 30% and 20% in turn.
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarize the information by selectin and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The maps give information about a university sports court 73
- The maps show a road system as it is now and the proposed changes in future to reduce the number of accidents Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 73
- The diagrams show a small museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010 78
- The line graph shows the global demand for different textile fibers between 1980 and 2015 56
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng news by TV, Newspaper and Radio still shares a slumping pattern while the oppo...
^^
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...ing at nearly 22% and 30% respectively. Meanwhile people in 1995 barely used the internet...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, second, so, still, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1122.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75423728814 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86173016653 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533898305085 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.368001174 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.25 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246396230616 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109156440272 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631980451106 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137324760582 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409549747028 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng news by TV, Newspaper and Radio still shares a slumping pattern while the oppo...
^^
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...ing at nearly 22% and 30% respectively. Meanwhile people in 1995 barely used the internet...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, second, so, still, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1122.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75423728814 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86173016653 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533898305085 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.368001174 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.25 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246396230616 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109156440272 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631980451106 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137324760582 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409549747028 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.