The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions, measured in millions of tonnes, from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007.
The line graph compares data about how much millions of tonnes were emitted in UK acid rain emissions using four different sectors over a period of 16 years.
In general, it is clear from the graph that the four sectors went down quickly over the period shown. Otherwise, the highest millions of tonnes in the period were for transport and communication between 1990 and 2007.
In 1991, electricity, gas, and water supply were the main sector of UK acid rain emissions with almost 3.5 million tonnes. Whereas, other industries just under 2.3 million tonnes, transport and communication had only below 0.5 million tonnes. And the domestic had a million tonnes hit a trough. Between 1991 and 2007, the measure in millions of tonnes from electricity, gas, and water supply dropped dramatically to a trough of 0.5 million tonnes. By contrast, the figure for transport and communication remained relatively stable, at between 0.5 and 1 million tonnes, for the whole 16- year period, but other industries and domestic were declined slightly for each year
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-27 | lattethuc | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | Hanabi | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-26 | @annie3010 | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-21 | Trần Chí Hiển | view | |
| 2022-01-23 | moyonakako | 80 | view |
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London 2000 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions measured in millions of tonnes from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 40, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
The line graph compares data about how much millions of tonnes were emitted in UK a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, whereas, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08670520231 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61888626541 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549132947977 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3261197922 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.408705787791 0.215688989381 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182227371502 0.103423049105 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907243366006 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.290736828374 0.15604864568 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382786496745 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.