The table below gives information on UK acid rain emissions measured in millions of tonnes from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The table below gives information on UK acid rain emissions, measured in millions of tonnes, from
four different sectors between 1990 and 2007.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. Make
comparisons where relevant.

The line graph shows the amount of acid rain emissions in the UK from four different sectors during the period from 1990 to 2007.

It is clear that the total amount of UK acid rain emissions dropped significantly over the 1990-2007 period. Electricity, Gas and Water supply witnessed the most considerable decrease.

Looking further at the information we can see that Electricity, Gas and Water contributed the most acid rain emissions in 1990, with approximately 3.3 million tonnes of acid rains emitted. However this number plummeted to just half of million tonnes 17 years latter. The supplies from both Domestic and Other industries saw a drop as well. In 1991 Domestic had more than 0.5 million tonnes of acid rain emissions while Other industries had over 2 million. However those figures gradually fell to roughly 0.2 million and 1.2 million tonnes, respectively.

Unlike the other three supplies, Transport and Communication supply sector fluctuated from 1990 to 2007. It started at 0.7 million tonnes in 1990, then reached its peak at exactly 1 million tonnes in 2005 before went back to 0.7 million again 2 years latter.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-08-02 Hanabi 84 view
2022-01-10 mido2070 73 view
Essays by user Hanabi :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...3 million tonnes of acid rains emitted. However this number plummeted to just half of m...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 457, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...le Other industries had over 2 million. However those figures gradually fell to roughly...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, then, well, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 956.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13978494624 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6933069237 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596774193548 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0051424794 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291198291677 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114921563773 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826815302605 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19119732271 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611942722861 0.0819641961636 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.