The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions measured in millions of tonnes from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The line graph compares how many million tonnes of acid raid exposed by 4 different industries in England from 1991 to 2007.

Overall, it seems that most of acid rain emissions in these sectors diminished over this period, with a noticeable exception of the stability in the data of transport and communication.

In 1991, utilities produced the largest amount of acid rain, standing at around 3.4 million tonnes, which was dramatically higher than that of the remaining. Other industries ranked second with over 2 million tonnes in its acid rain output. The figures for the remaining sectors were just only approximately 600.000 tonnes.

However, electricity, gas and water supply reduced their acid rain emission significantly to only 0.5 million tonnes during the period shown. Although other sectors tried to cut their acid rain disposal level to only 1.2 million tonnes, its figure was the highest in 2007. After a slight growth to 1 million tonnes of acid rain emissions, transport and communication sector ended up at around 700.000 tonnes. In terms of household category, it emitted the lowest amount of acid rain over the period, continuing decline gradually at only 200,000 tonnes in the final year.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1022.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21428571429 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67204744862 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602040816327 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3590962654 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.555555556 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23673530428 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111083792735 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475098170404 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154692172351 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044198678344 0.0819641961636 54% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.