many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit those places.
These days, museums and other historical landmarks have been crowded with foreign visitors, rather than attracting the attention of local inhabitants. I believe there are several possible reasons for this and also, some actions need to be taken to promptly promote these locations.
The reason most locals are not so interested in paying a visit to their local museum has many contributing factors. First and foremost, locals pay less attention to sites related to history due to the familiarity of values, folks and norms. Furthermore, the local people are extremely acquainted with the presence of the museums and historical sites within their area, they are also familiar with the old days of their country, therefore having a tendency to take them for granted. Above all, it is factual that these sites are annually appealing to over sea tourists, who are enthusiasts of discovering many traditional heritages, local history and, be it for knowledge or for their own curiosity.
Dealing with these obstacles constitute a real challenge, but not an impasse. One of the effective ways to address the attention and interest of people is to show them the importance and the availability of local museums along with cultural locations. As an example, media coverage and public-oriented shows can have a tremendous impact on providing a comprehensive view of local cultures and traditions so that they could become more engaging to indigenous residents. Besides, museums and other aesthetic institutions should stage periodic exhibitions to promote local cultures and thus preserve the beauty of historical art.
In conclusion, there is a range of reasons for local people being less interested in their own historical places, compare to their foreign counterpart. However, it is feasible to mitigate this problem, provided that local authorities and museum join hands in this process.
- Topic: technology is becoming increasingly prevalent in the world today. In the not too distant future, technology will completely replace the teacher in the classroom. Do you agree with this statement? 56
- some people think that parents should teach children how to be good member of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. 56
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction. Do you agree or disagree?Provide relevant examples if necessary. 67
- Topic: technology is becoming increasingly prevalent in the world today. In the not too distant future, technology will completely replace the teacher in the classroom. Do you agree with this statement? 56
- some people regard video games as harmless fun, or even as a useful educational tool. others, however, believe that video games are having an adverse effect on the people who play them. in your opinion, do the drawbacks outweigh the benefits? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 570, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...nnually appealing to over sea tourists, who are enthusiasts of discovering many traditi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, however, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37373737374 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89199522192 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582491582492 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1196360928 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30266742484 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111523118739 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588721011814 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180900702704 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448631405328 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.