The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999
The line graph below illustrates how the percentage of the unemployed people in the USA and Japan from March 1993 to March 1999.
Looking at the graph, the unemployment rate in the USA reduced while the contrast was true for Japan over the whole period surveyed.
In the first year surveyed, there was a contrast pattern in the figure of people being out of work both in the USA and Japan, with the former reaching a peak of 7.0 percent and the later hit the lowest point of 2.5 percent.
In the remaining years, the people who did not have work in the USA was seen an erratic drop by 2 percent in 1996 before going up and down around 5.0 percent till 1999. Meanwhile, the proportion in Japan, which rocketed by twofold of nearly 4.5 percent in 1996 compared to 1993, subsequently, the figure kept growing dramatically at 5.0 percent in the last year.
Summary, although the number of unemployed people in America was over 2.5 higher than Japan in 1993 but both countries changed markedly during 7 years period and got at 5.0 percent in 1999.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'charts'.
Suggestion: charts
The given chart below indicates variations in the perce...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of people being out-of-work both in the US and Japan, with the former reaching a...
^^
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... with the former reaching a peak of 7.0% and the later hit the lowest point of 2....
^^
Line 4, column 70, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...umber of unemployed people was witnessed to drop erratically from 7.0% to 5.0% in...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 649.0 965.302439024 67% => OK
No of words: 137.0 196.424390244 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73722627737 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.42121322205 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60245338086 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598540145985 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 179.1 283.868780488 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1140734517 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.166666667 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.83333333333 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357023573511 0.215688989381 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149343151082 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139526520893 0.0843802449381 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206880629581 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136657175595 0.0819641961636 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.