The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999.
The given line chart below illustrates that how many people in America and Japan were jobless from March 1993 to March 1999.
Overall, it is clear that initially, the unemployment rate in US was highest, while the reverse was true for japan. However, these two countries followed an opposite trend and equalized each other at the end of the period.
According to the graph, in March 1993, almost 7% of the workforce in US had no occupation, whereas japan stood at 2.5%. After this, their ratio in both countries fluctuated and moved steadily in the opposite direction. In the next year, the figure for America dropped to 6.5% and then to 6% until 1995. Comparatively, in these two years, the japan encountered a growth in their unemployed people which escalated to just over 3.5%. The US has experienced a further 1% decline in an unoccupied professionals in 1997, becoming 5% which then plateaued until 1999. However, after a substantial increase in unemployment in japan, its percentage climbed significantly by reaching to the same level as US in 1998 at 5%. And then remain unchanged in the following year, despite up and downs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-02 | InamAli | 89 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | InamAli | 93 | view |
| 2022-05-30 | Dhvani Bhanushali | view | |
| 2022-05-30 | Dhvani Bhanushali | view | |
| 2022-05-30 | Dhvani Bhanushali | view |
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999 89
- Improvements in health education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations However the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas To what extent do you agree or disagree w 73
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 73
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 78
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94270833333 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80132327827 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640625 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.4519486905 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.9 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324449696189 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103566215457 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113977459842 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217598673351 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0894604899347 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.