The pie chart below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000
The given pie charts below present units of electricity production by different source in 2 countries namely Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
As can be seen from the charts that while the total production increased 70 units in 2000 compared to 100 units in 1980 in Australia, the total production was towfold in 2000 in France (180 units).
According to the data, a half of power was produced by coal in 1980, subsequently, that figure took off from 50 units to 130 units in 2000 and it was the main fuel source in Australia. The electricity came from Hydro power and Natural gas ranked second (20 units) in 1980. However, while the energy generated by Hydro power increased modestly (36 units), the using of Natural gas crashed at 2 units. The lowest used energy belonged to oil.
On the contrary, in France, two decade witnessed a soar of Nuclear power in electricity generation (126 units) compared to 15 units in 1980. Coal and Natural gas shared equal propotion as the each created 25 units of electricity in 1980, followed by Hydro power and oil (5 units and 20 units respectively). Nevertheless, in 2000, coal and oil each made 25 units of energy while the other resources were no longer significant.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 33, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'decade' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'decades'.
Suggestion: decades
...o oil. On the contrary, in France, two decade witnessed a soar of Nuclear power in el...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, second, so, while, as to, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 998.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70754716981 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63761505378 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518867924528 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9591874774 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.888888889 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 5.23603664747 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.438985403846 0.215688989381 204% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190767871575 0.103423049105 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.181973791286 0.0843802449381 216% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.332895812834 0.15604864568 213% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.176299812086 0.0819641961636 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.