The graph below shows the value of fuel, food and manufactured goods exported by one country from 2000 to 2005.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagram illustrates the worth of exportation of food, fuel and manufactured goods in one country between 2000 to 2005
Overall, Fuel was a second to none in 2000. However, in 2005, nothing could compare with manufactured goods. Meanwhile, no value of selected export was as lowest as food exported throughout 5 years.
At the beginning, Fuel was the most crucial exported commodities, with nearly 45 000 million dollars while it became unpopular output in 2005 with only 20 000 million dollars. At this time, the value of manufactured goods increased significantly from 15 000 million dollars to 25 000 million dollars before dropping to 20000 million dollars in 2003. After 5 years, manufactured goods received a noticeable priority despite it was less attention initially. Over 5 consecutive years, starting from 2000, food exporting had the figure standing at under 10 000 million dollars.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-27 | cindycornelia98 | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-02 | jjferns | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-09 | Sreeveni Das | 56 | view |
| 2019-05-15 | kimmie | 56 | view |
| 2019-01-31 | gatau4 | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the value of fuel, food and manufactured goods exported by one country from 2000 to 2005.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Some pp think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views and 84
- In many countries, very few young people read newspapers or follow the news on TV. What do you think are the causes of this? What solutions can you suggest? 78
- The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007. 100
- Some people believe that preserving natural environment is crucial, however, most make no effort to do so. Why do you think this is happening? What are some simple actions that could help the environment? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 761.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 144.0 196.424390244 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28472222222 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.46410161514 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87750662333 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.631944444444 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 211.5 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2968348839 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.714285714 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244945400936 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125701030279 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0871275638607 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227691483649 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0951569681549 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.