The graph below shows the weekday volume of passenger activity on the Toronto Metro system for July 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The line graph below illustrates the weekday volume of passenger activity on Toronto Metro system for the year 2007 in the month of July.
It is clear that maximum number of people shows the activity at 8 in the morning and 6 in the evening. However, its lowest peak garners 100 thousands commuters around 6 a.m and 4 p.m.
First of all, the activity at Toronto Metro starts at 6 a.m and accounts as minimum of 100,000 people. It then steeply goes up at 7 a.m and reaches a peak of 400 thousands passengers at 8 in the morning. Between 8 and 10 a.m, there is a gradual fall before it slowly rises up at 11 a.m. From 12 to 2 p.m, there is a stabilization about 200 thousands passengers.
There is a sharp decline to the lowest peak at 4 p.m and then almost reaches a peak again at 6 in the evening. At 8 p.m, it falls dramatically about 100,000 commuters before it gradually roses up at 9 in the evening and falls again 10 p.m

Votes
Average: 7.2 (15 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line graph below illustrates the wee...
^^^
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The line graph below illustrates the weekday volume of...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or the year 2007 in the month of July. It is clear that maximum number of peopl...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ands commuters around 6 a.m and 4 p.m. First of all, the activity at Toronto Me...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...zation about 200 thousands passengers. There is a sharp decline to the lowest p...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, then, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 753.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.23033707865 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54937976867 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533707865169 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.533792475 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.571428571 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12217671013 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075646779509 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119061994826 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11641178298 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141277328182 0.0819641961636 172% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.94 61.2550243902 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.55 11.4140731707 66% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.