the graph compares employment rates in three sectors of the economy, in the Uk, 2000 - 2010.
summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant
The graph illustrates information about the proportion of people who employed in three different sectors in UK, over a ten-year period between 2000 and 2010.
Overall, what stands out is that there were considerable increases in both of private sector and self-employed sector, whereas people who worked in public sector saw a substantial fall. Another interesting point is that in 2000, public sector had the highest proportion but in 2010, the figure of private sector was higher than the others.
In terms of self-employed sector, it began at almost 20% in 2000 and the rose slightly at 20% in 2005 before saw a considerable upward trend. And the proportion reached a pick at 30% in 2010. Likewise, approximately 40% of people worked in private sector in the first year, after that the figure flutuated and increased to a high of just over 50% in 2010.
In contrast, public sector accounted for nearly 50% of the employees in 2000. Then, there was a dramatical decrease to low of 20% in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-02 | Leeinho | 73 | view |
| 2018-02-12 | amfeja | 56 | view |
| 2017-03-19 | Huyen Trang | 73 | view |
| 2017-03-19 | Huyen Trang | 73 | view |
| 2017-03-19 | Huyen Trang | 91 | view |
- the graph below gives info about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007. 73
- the graph shows UK acid rain emissions, from 4 different sectors between 1990 to 2007. 67
- The pie charts show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 78
- the expenditure on fast food by income groups, UK 1990. 61
- the graph below shows the average growth in domestic products in wealthy countries countries that have adopted a global approach to business and countries that have not writing a report 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, likewise, then, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 829.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87647058824 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77670113699 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552941176471 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2250888775 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.625 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213792976338 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0978730115382 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656897684013 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147587867872 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672353096528 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.