The graph demonstrates the proportion of total sales of car producers in four regions of the world over the course of five year
The graph demonstrates the proportion of total sales of car producers in four regions of the world over the course of five years, starting from 2006. Overall, there was an upward trend in the percentage of cars sold by Asian and North American car companies, as opposed to the data for the other regions. Also, North America registered the lowest figures throughout the surveyed period, bottoming in 2009.
In 2006, the percentage of total sales of Asian car companies, starting at 30%, which tripled the data for North America. Then, a sharp ascent of 20% to reach 50% in 2010 was seen in the amount of money collected from car manufacturers in Asia. Meanwhile, the proportion of cars sold by producers in North America witnessed a two-fold descent to hit a record low of 5% in 2009 before recovering rapidly to 11% in 2010.
In the first year of the period, the sale percentage of South American car manufacturers constituted 30% of total sales, which fell dramatically and remained unchanged at 21% in the next two years. Likewise, there was a significant rise in the data for European car producers to the top at 38% in 2008, before decreasing steadily to reach a record low of 30% in 2010. Meanwhile, there was a gradual decrease in the figure for South America and then remained almost unchanged at 21% in the next 2 years, followed by a significant descent to reach a record-low of 9% in the last year.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, likewise, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1166.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 248.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70161290323 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7299072036 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487903225806 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 350.1 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.0717078478 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.555555556 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5555555556 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295967485233 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140619521393 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.213697810768 0.0843802449381 253% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219704296457 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140547429888 0.0819641961636 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.