The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
The table compares the proportion of consumer expenditure 3 categories of items in 5 different countries in 2002. Overall, food/drinks/Tobacco registered the highest data among all countries, with the highest choice in Turkey. While leisure and education were the least paid attention by this group.
Regarding Food/drinks/tobacco, Turkey hold the lion’s share of 32.14% in the percentage of consumer spending, followed by the figure for Ireland, at 28.19%. Meanwhile, the rate of expenditure in Sweden paid out for Food/drinks/tobacco was 15.77%, by half in this data for Turkey. In particular, clothing and footwear accounted for a minority of 5.4% in the Sweden’s consumer spending, as opposed to the figure for Italy, at 9%.
With respect to leisure/education, it is also mostly chosen by Turkey people, at 4.35%, which is higher than that of other countries. Surprisingly, the same number is recorded for Italy and Sweden, at 3.2% and 3.22%, respectively. Meanwhile, a similar pattern was witnessed in the data for Ireland and Spain, at 2.2 % and 1.98%, in that order.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | Noah1997 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | shayma | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | phungnguyen1611 | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | IVANTRUONG | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | IVANTRUONG | 11 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 39, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Turkey) must be used with a third-person verb: 'holds'.
Suggestion: holds
... Regarding Food/drinks/tobacco, Turkey hold the lion's share of 32.14% in the ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, so, while, in particular, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41176470588 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.54227668118 2.65546596893 133% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617647058824 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.6678691397 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.222222222 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0924630631082 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055160844671 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133923964297 0.0843802449381 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0770825358229 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.089475241938 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.