The graph gives information on wages of some country over a ten-year period.
The graph illustrates percentages of growth in wages of some country from 1993 to 2003. It can be clearly seen that people got the highest salaries in the year 1994 and 1999.
According to the graph, wages doubled rapidly during 1993, rising from 2% to 4%, marking it the second highest salary of the period before dropping quickly in the following years and gradually maintaining stability at 3% during 1996. However, there was a remarkable and continuous increase of wage afterwards, growing up to the highest wage recorded at 6%. Then as surprisingly as it climbed, statistics showed that it suddenly failed down during 1999 until stopping at about 3% - the same wage with the year 1996's. The amount of salary remained unchanged during 2000 before decreasing in the following 3 years. It reached its bottom at 1% in the early of 2003 then slowly went up again.
In a word, growth rate in wages changed unevenly on the year of the period and the graph proved that people were paid with better salaries back in the past, particularly between 1996 and 2000.
- The graph gives information on wages of some country over a ten-year period. 78
- Should English be made the official world language? Why, or why not? 61
- Even though globalization affects the world in a very positive way, its negative side should not be forgotten. Discuss. 11
- Some students prefer to take a gap between high school and university, to work or to travel. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, second, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 876.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7868852459 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50160628926 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617486338798 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.23603664747 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226075331605 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970099107198 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0802187882764 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168698178754 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341382147584 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.