the graph illustrate wheat exports of three regions between 1985 and 1990
The line graph illustrates the amount of wheat exported in Australia, Canada and European Community over the period of five years, staring in 1985.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately clear that Canada exported more wheat than Australia and European community for most of the period shown. While, Canada's wheat exports fluctuated and Australia's fell, wheat exports from the European Community rose steadily.
In 1985, the amount of wheat European community exported stood at around 17 million tonnes. It, then decreased to under 15 million tonnes one year later before a slight increase to exactly 15 million tonnes by 1988. However, over the last three years, a considerable increase was witnessed in wheat exports, and European community exported the largest amount of wheat out of three regions examined. By contrast, an opposite trend was seen in wheat exports in Australia. After a slight rise, it fell gradually form over 15 million tonnes to over 10 million tonnes by 1989, and remained unchanged at this level towards the end of the period.
Over the period, Canada experienced significant fluctuations, in 1985, about 19 million tonnes of wheat was exported. It declined slightly before resurging to 25 million tonnes in 1988, which is the highest point of the paragraph. However, the figure immediately fell steeply to under 15 million tones one year later. Finally, a rise of nearly 5 million tonnes was registered in the last year of the period.
- the graph illustrate wheat exports of three regions between 1985 and 1990 73
- although more and more people read news on the internet, newspaper will remain the most important source of news. do you agree or disagree 67
- scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree?? 73
- Some people argue that technological inventions such as mobile phones are making people socially less interactive. Do you agree or disagree?? 78
- The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishmentson driving offenses. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... one year later before a slight increase to exactly 15 million tonnes by 1988. Ho...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, look, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1229.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14225941423 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60123204484 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510460251046 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 366.3 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1011706742 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.416666667 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9166666667 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235171942645 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104405070923 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0992947270834 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173138402733 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0823297204627 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.