The graph illustrates the amount of spreads consumed from 1981 to 2007.
The line graph compares the quantity of margarine, butter, low-fat and reduced spreads consumed between 1981 and 2007. The quantities are measures on grams.
From the figures, it can be inferred that there was a significant decline in the consumption of margarine and butter and a marked growth in the use of low-fat and reduced spreads over the period 1981 to 2007.
Butter was the most popular fat in the beginning of the period. However, apart from a brief rise from 1981 to 1986 to reach the peak at 160 grams per person per week, the consumption of butter went down gradually over the next 26 years to finish at just 50 grams. The consumption of margarine began lower than that of butter at 90 grams. The first excess in quantity of margarine compared with that of butter was in 1991, but after 1996 there was a steady downward trend in the figure of consumed which seem set to continue.
Low-fat spreads was introduced in 1996 and the biggest rise was seen in their use from that time , to over 80 grams. Although in 2001, they were more than either types of fat, the consumption decreased continually to finish at 40 grams.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-17 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
- Water is natural resource that should always be free. Governments should ban the sale of bottled water.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- We can not help everyone in the world that needs help, so we should only be concerned with our own communities and countries.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement. 56
- The graph shows changes of amount and type of fast food consumed by teenagers in Australia from 1975 to 2000. 73
- The exploration and development of safe alternatives to fossil fuels should be the most important global priority today.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The graph shows the average annual expenditure on cell phone and residential phone services. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ally over the next 26 years to finish at just 50 grams. The consumption of margar...
^^
Line 7, column 97, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ise was seen in their use from that time , to over 80 grams. Although in 2001, the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63861386139 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40494003302 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534653465347 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3954166982 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.111111111 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191308230695 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808815160812 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102589747359 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147693493332 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0821599768005 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.