The graph provides information about the sales of three different types of music in England .
The diagrams depict the sales figures for three music genres annually . Pop music consistently emerged as the top-selling genre, as indicated by the bar chart, while the line graph highlights an upward trajectory for pop and rock sales but a decline for classical music.
The bar chart showcases fluctuating sales for all music genres over the years, with pop consistently leading and peaking at £5 billion in 2001. Rock recorded its highest sales in 2001 at €4 billion, while classical music consistently lagged behind, with the lowest sales in 2001 at just over £1 billion.
Examining the line graph, pop music sales more than doubled from around £2.2 billion in 1960 to £5 billion in 1990, reflecting substantial growth. In contrast, classical music sales decreased by 50% from £4 billion to £2 billion during the same period. Rock sales saw a significant increase from €2 billion to £4.5 billion between 1960 and 1980, followed by a sharp decline to around £3.5 billion in the subsequent decade.
In conclusion, the data illustrates the dynamic sales patterns of pop, rock, and classical music genres over different timeframes, emphasizing the enduring popularity of pop music and contrasting trends for rock and classical music sales.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... figures for three music genres annually . Pop music consistently emerged as the t...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...les but a decline for classical music. The bar chart showcases fluctuating sale...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sales in 2001 at just over £1 billion. Examining the line graph, pop music sale...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...£3.5 billion in the subsequent decade. In conclusion, the data illustrates the ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, while, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1059.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26865671642 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64783002158 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55223880597 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2712064796 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.375 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198979356607 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11211483038 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444903042073 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137619565969 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369693916933 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.