The graph shows average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010.
The graph provides average annual spending on cell phone and residential phone services from 2001 to 2010.
Overall, the begin with there was a dramatic decrease in the number of cell phone services in 2001, while the figure for residential phone services sharply rise in 2001.
It is clear that the number of cell phone witnessed a significant declare of $200 in 2001, after 4 years, a noticeable rise of $500 was seen in the number of cell phone services. While the begin with average annual expenditures on residential phone service sharply go up in 2001. The number of residential phone services rose sharply to $700 but that of residential phone went down $450 over the 2005 year period.
To 2006, the number of cell phone increased remarkably to $550, while a significant go down of $550 was seen in the number of residential phone services in 2006. Then, the year 2010 saw a considerable rise of $750 in the number of cell phone services, whilst there was a dramatic fall of $400 in the number of residential phone services in 2010
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 10, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...e services from 2001 to 2010. Overall, the begin with there was a dramatic decrease in t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n in the number of cell phone services. While the begin with average annual expenditu...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...he number of cell phone services. While the begin with average annual expenditures on res...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 846.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64835164835 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65147324124 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 73.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.401098901099 0.547539520022 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3584033352 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.857142857 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.531453657957 0.215688989381 246% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.344395508095 0.103423049105 333% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14872107857 0.0843802449381 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.436340935156 0.15604864568 280% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142151890007 0.0819641961636 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.83 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.