the graph shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Depicted by the chart is the information about the average amount of carbon dioxide emissions emitted individually by people in four different countries over 4 decades, since 1967. The unit is measured in metric tonnes.
Overall, it can be seen that there were two distinct trends in the emissions of carbon dioxide in all countries.
1967, the figures for United Kingdom and Sweden were the two highest, with around 11 and 9 severally, where the former was the highest level recorded. This is followed by Italy, in which the inhabitant was responsible for producing just over 4 carbon dioxide emissions. Meanwhile, the smallest amount of CO2 emissions (just under 2) was produced by people in Portugal.
After 1967, United Kingdom and Sweden showed a similar pattern, while the former decreased gradually to around 7 by 2007, despite reaching a peak at just over 10 in 1997, the latter’s number then experienced almost a half drop, tailing off to just beneath 6 (2007). In contrast, the figures for Italy and Portugal increased consistently, where that for the former inclined to just under 8 in 2007, while Portugal witnessed five-fold growth at the end of period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-29 | Mohamad Alen Aliansyah | 84 | view |
- University should accept equal numbers of male and female study in every subject. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010. 78
- the graph shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 84
- Below is the map of Canterbury town. There is a plan of building a new school in this town where two possible sites (S1) and (S2) have been proposed. 84
- In recent years, the number of visitors of art galleries are decreasing steadily.What are the reasons for this trend?What can be done to improve the number of visitors. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 60, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...seen that there were two distinct trends in the emissions of carbon dioxide in al...
^^
Line 11, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rn, while the former decreased gradually to around 7 by 2007, despite reaching a ...
^^
Line 11, column 198, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...er 10 in 1997, the latter's number then experienced almost a half drop, tailing...
^^^^
Line 11, column 467, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... five-fold growth at the end of period.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 989.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09793814433 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71782474929 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60824742268 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.8870956637 43.030603864 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.625 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265804350616 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103857450813 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0307826277626 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147726222942 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024075446405 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.