The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London, 2000-2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph indicates how much 3 bakeries in London earned on a year basis over a decade from 2000 to 2010.
Overall, while there’s a substantial and regular increase in the annual wages of Robie’s Bakery and Bemie’s Bun, the revenue of Lovely Loaves fluctuated and fell drastically and its highest position was replaced by Robbie’s Bakery, which experienced the fastest growth, in the final year.
In 1990, Lovely Loaves earned 80000 pounds; meanwhile, the receipts of Robie’s Bakery and Bemie’s Bun were just nearly 60000 and 20000 pounds respectively. In 2006, the figures for Robbie’s Bakery rose slightly to 60000 pounds after stabilizing for 50 years and that for Bemie’s Bun had reached a plateau at just under 40000 pounds. Following the reverse pattern, from 1990 to 2006, Lovely Loaves witnessed a significant decline in the yearly incomes to less than 60000 pounds except a recover to approximately 90000 pounds in 2004.
By 2007, Robbies’s Bakery had surpassed Lovely Loaves and became the bakery with the highest wages (about 65000 pounds). From then, the statistics of Bemie’s Bun and Robbie’s Bakery surged to over 60000 pounds and more than 100000 thousands by agreement; whilst, that of Lovely Loaves continued to plunged to 40000 in the final year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-14 | thuytrangbl1 | view |
- The graph below shows changes in young adult unemployment rates in England between 1993 and 2012. 84
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development. 73
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000. 56
- proportion of graduate with sciene degree and art degree 84
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 505, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ncomes to less than 60000 pounds except a recover to approximately 90000 pounds in 2004. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1123.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37320574163 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92911297932 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564593301435 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.5487197102 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.428571429 112.824112599 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8571428571 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.14285714286 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0862276726372 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592289529989 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650697215709 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0828238153683 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0721769271115 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.2329268293 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.46 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.