The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the changes in the oil production capacity in millions of barrels per day in six countries between 1990 and 2010.
Overall, oil production capacity increased in all countries during this 20 years period. In addition, the figures for Saudi Arabia were higher than in others countries whereas the oil of production was lowest in Qatar.
From 1990 to 2010, there was a significant increase in oil production in Saudi Arabia. In 1990, Saudi Arabia produced over 8 million barrels per day and this rose rapidly, reaching the peak of over 14 million barrels per day. By contrast, the lowest oil producing nation was Qatar. The figure for Qatar remained at under 1 million barrels per day although in 2000 saw a slight increase.
Oil production capacity in Iran increased gradually from about 3 million barrels per day to above 4 million barrels per day in 2010. Although three different countries namely UAE, Kuwait, Iraq saw an increase in the production of oil between 1990 to 2010, the amount of oil produced reached under 4 million barrels in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-06 | Sanaullah97 | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-06 | Sanaullah97 | 73 | view |
| 2020-07-16 | ngoctham4344 | 61 | view |
| 2020-05-03 | Sang Sang Sang | 70 | view |
| 2017-07-21 | sonchip96hb | 77 | view |
- The world s most urgent problem is caused by over population Do you agree or disagree 80
- Modern technology now allows rapid and uncontrolled access to and exchange of information Far from being beneficial this is a danger to our societies To what extent do you agree or disagree 66
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Today more and more people are using mobile phones and computers. Thus, people are losing the ability to communicate face to face. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The users of social media such as Facebook Twitter are replacing face to face contact in this century Do you think the advantages of this way outweigh the disadvantages 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94505494505 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55203071408 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494505494505 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1646320652 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198151263991 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112421093099 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693322488762 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164457626901 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511666219 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.