The graph shows Internet Usage in Taiwan by Age Group, 1998-2000
The given graph illustrates the number of the Internet users in Taiwan classified into four groups of age, between 1998 and 2000.
Overall, the most significant popular age of Taiwanese using the Internet was from 16 to 30 years old, while the groups which aged 50 or more and that under 15 years old accounted for the minor proportion in the chart.
Firstly, looking at the absolute majority of the Internet users in Taiwan, it is clear that the percentage of the Internet users from 16 to 50 years old was at least four-fold higher than the combined of the left age groups. In detail, there was 53% people from 16 to 30 years old accessed to the Internet in 1998. Though this figure moderately decreased over the period of the next two years to score at 45% in 1999 and 44% in 2000, it remained as the most significant observed portion. Also, the second position belonged to the group of age from 31 to 50 years with the slightly dropping of 2%, from 41% in 1998 to 39% in 1999, before continuing to fall by 2%, at 37% in 2000.
Secondly, regarding the two remaining factors. The percentage of old people aged 50 or more years old using the Internet doubled from 4% in 1998 to 8% in 1999, then kept increasing to reach 10% in 2000, while the rate of the under 15 years old Internet users rose up four-fold in two previous years, from 2% to 8%, and climbed to 9% in the last of tracking year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | trinhthanh1 | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
- It is inevitable that as technology develops traditional cultures must be lost. Technology and tradition are incompatible. You cannot have both together. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 84
- Many university students live with their families while others need to live to live away from home because their universities are in different places. What are the advantages and disadvantages both situations. 84
- Education for young people is important in many countries However the others think the government should spend more money on education in adult population who cannot read and write To what extend you agree or disagree 75
- The diagram below illustrates the carbon cycle in nature 78
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, look, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, while, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 33.7804878049 181% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1145.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 260.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.40384615385 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34451077396 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503846153846 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.2155879546 43.030603864 184% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.125 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.5 22.9334400587 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 5.23603664747 205% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270873642942 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142468511891 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124091305272 0.0843802449381 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223314719716 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129930115612 0.0819641961636 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.84 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.83 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.