Topic: Fossil fuels (coal, oil, natural gas) are the main sources in many countries, but in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy (wind energy and solar energy) are encouraged. To what extent do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, the use of renewable energy in many developed nations is seriously taken into consideration since the enormous contribution of these alternative sources of energy to our planet. Personally, this is a positive tendency. In this essay, information and evidence are given to clarify my point views.
Firstly, renewable energy comes from sources that hardly can be depleted. Apparently, energy from renewable sources can be resupplied based on the natural physic cycles. In detail, solar power and wind power are the two common types of green energy, beside that hydro power, bio-mass and geothermal power are additional forms that produce power for our planet instantly. Because of creating by nature, all of these powers are virtually limitless while in theory, fossil fuels are finite based on how they are originated. For example, if we could harvest the sunlight comes down to our earth daily by solar panels or other scientific equipment, we would generate enough power for everything in an entire year without worrying about the exhaustion.
Secondly, using natural sources is safe for the environment as no emissions or waste are discharged. Fossil fuels release carbon dioxide when they burn, which causes severe pollution, such as adds the greenhouse effect or increases the global warming. Moreover, fossil fuels also contribute to sulfur emission to the atmosphere leading to acid rains which can cause damage to buildings. In contrast, renewable energy offers a nearly zero emissions of carbon dioxide or any types of pollution. The use of renewable energy dramatically reduce the dependence on fossil fuels as a source of energy. Consequently, the air pollution is immense cutting off. As our demand for energy keeps growing, the discovery of the Eco-friendly sources has a likelihood of becoming inevitable trend.
To conclude, although the alternative energy can be costly than using fossil fuels; however, the long-term advantages that renewable sources can devote to our environment in general, and to each individual in particular are unquestionable.
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- It is inevitable that as technology develops traditional cultures must be lost. Technology and tradition are incompatible. You cannot have both together. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 84
- The rate of unemployment in some countries is high Because of this there is no need to complete an education beyond a primary school level 64
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. Dinosaur, dodos ...) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- Many university students live with their families while others need to live to live away from home because their universities are in different places. What are the advantages and disadvantages both situations. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 253, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...effect or increases the global warming. Moreover fossil fuels also contribute to sulfur ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in contrast, in general, in particular, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1762.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43827160494 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84660947269 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595679012346 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7029028733 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.125 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3125 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267350599583 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0932689431384 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0806495646458 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167820458622 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362126950401 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.