Given is the line graph illustrating data on the changes in the monthly income of Japanese people and the prices of two types of television gap of 30 years, starting in 1953.
It is conspicuous that the amount of money people earned leaped considerably while the opposite was true for the price of television followed. Furthermore, color televisions cost much more than black and white ones.
When it comes to the figure for black and white television cost, it began at 110 thoussand Yen for the former and drop to 40 thousand Yen for the later from 1953 to 1963. The ensuing years recorded a steady fall to 20 thousand Yen. Likewise, the rest of the period heralded a ceaseless there was a considerable slump from 100 to 60 thousand Yen between 1963 and 1973. This data also gradually plunge gradually to somewhere in the vicinity of 48 thousand Yen.
In terms of income, starting at just under 20 thousand Yen in 1953 and thereafter the amount of average monthly salary rose steadily to 30 thousand Yen in 1973. Furthermore, this figure climbed rapidly and hit the highest point of fluctuating by 68 thousand Yen in 1983.
- Some people believe that a country will benefit greatly if its students study abroad To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The maps show improvements that have been made to a university campus between 2010 and the present day Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages of this outweigh its disadvantages 78
- The diagrams show changes in a student common room 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, likewise, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 930.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72081218274 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61595230704 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578680203046 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1887521885 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.333333333 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331372918095 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12182083587 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689569096033 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187786801021 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250834997589 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.