The maps show a road system as it is now and the proposed changes in future to reduce the number of accidents. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
Given are the two maps delineating the suggested transformation of a transportation system in future to minimise the figure of traffic accidents.
It is perceptible that significant changes are predicted in both the east side and the west side of the system with the existence roundabout and traffic light.
To the east of the system, there is a prediction that a roundabout is built at the crossroad of the city road and forest road where takes place frequently accidents. In lieu of linking the supermarket with the city road, the supermarket is projected to connect directly to the aforementioned roundabout with the same purpose.
To the west side of this region, the city road is proposed to become a straight line, which is a junction of the previous low lane and the city road with a traffic light system to avoid extreme traffic accidents. The house crossing the low lane is anticipated to stay unchanged.
- The map shows how coastal land develops into a coastal park 78
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education centre in the year 2009 The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants 78
- The line graph shows the percentage of people accessing news from 4 sources 89
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages of this outweigh its disadvantages
- The graph below shows the percentage of people in different age groups in one city who attended music concert between 2010 and 2015
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the two maps delineating the suggested ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 762.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91612903226 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98671355446 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 77.0 106.607317073 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496774193548 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7356325615 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8333333333 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.333333333333 5.23603664747 6% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124841729695 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628183682048 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445237243332 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0763880108587 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0193519783096 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.