The graph shows the number of boys and girls playing sport in an English town in 2012.
The bar chart illustrates how many children, divided by gender, played six kinds of sports (tennis, badminton, cycling, swimming, football and hockey) in a town in England in 2012.
Overall, the number of boys playing sport exceeded that of girls in the given period and the sport with the most significant difference between the genders was football. Football was also the most popular sport for boys, while the majority of girls preferred swimming. Furthermore, both males and females least preferred playing hockey.
There were four sports in which boys participated more than girls. While 60 boys played football, the number of girls playing that sport was considerably lower (around 20). With regards to tennis, the figure (4) for boys who played that sport was 50 as opposed to just under 40 for girls. Similarly, more boys cycled than girls (approximately 35 and 20, respectively). The difference, in terms of hockey, was minimal, with only about 5 more boys playing that sport than girls.
On the other hand, more girls took part in the two remaining sports, which both showed a difference of about 10 between the genders. As many as 50 girls preferred swimming in comparison to 40 girls for badminton.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-27 | giangngoc | 67 | view |
| 2022-11-03 | chikien06 | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-29 | myduyen282 | 93 | view |
| 2022-07-04 | Taytor2609 | 85 | view |
| 2022-02-21 | Puja Bastakoti | 100 | view |
- As the number of cars increases more money has to be spent on road systems Some people think the government should pay for this Others however think that the user should cover the costs Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
- The graph shows the number of boys and girls playing sport in an English town in 2012 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, similarly, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1011.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02985074627 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59527018649 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55223880597 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.4254020891 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9090909091 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2727272727 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346472336299 0.215688989381 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138000488668 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718284292137 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192861742557 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577438890469 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.