The graph shows the number of hours children aged 10-11 spend on watching TV and computers from 2000 to the present.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wher relevant.
The line graph illustrates the quantity of hours spent weekly on watching television and using computers by children from 10-11 years old during the period from 2000 to the present.
It can be clearly seen that there are two basic general trends: upward and fluctuation. It is also noticeable to see that at the very first begining in 2000, the amount of time spent on television overweighed the one that spent on computers; however, an opposite trend has been witnessed since 2004.
Looking at the details, in 2000 only nearly 4 hours per week were spent on using computers. This number surged markedly in the period of 4 years later, outreached the time spent on television in 2004 and has started its overwhelming growth from 2004 till now. It reacged it first peak at nearly 22 hours, which was slightly higher in comparison with television's first peak in 2000.
In contrast, starting with a peak at nearly 21 hours, the volume of time spent on television went through a period of stability in 2004-2005, followed by a considerable drop by 6 hours. This number dipped and hit a trough at 14 hours in 2005-2006. Since 2007, this number has experienced the second period of stability at more than 14 hours.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, look, second, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1004.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78095238095 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6223528927 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580952380952 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6140077229 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.555555556 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135688250889 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628196013061 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085701348396 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108225810082 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111134397747 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.