the graph shows the number of road accidents in Nakhorn Ratchasima in 2003
The graph displays the amount of road accidents in Nakhorn Ratchasima, measured in 0 to 100 over a period of months, including from February to December, Overall it can be seen that the trend of accidents fluctuated wildly throughout the period, especially, the term of accidents had a moderate increase during May through the end of period.
As far as the number of accidents of route concerned, There was a steep growth from 30 in February to 90 in April, and sank by 65 in May. In the next four months, the trend remained unchanged under 30, followed by a period of a dramatic rise. In addition, Between August and October there was a significant increase to 50, but then stabilized to November. At the end of period, the number of accidents of Na Nakhorn Ratchasima road rose drastically to 80.
- the graph shows the number of road accidents in Nakhorn Ratchasima in 2003 56
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010. 67
- The graph below shows the population figures of different types of turtles in India between 1980 and 2012. 56
- percentage of tourists to England who visited Brighton attractions 61
- The graph gives information from Annual Energy Outlook 2008 about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ned, There was a steep growth from 30 in February to 90 in April, and sank by 65 ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, then, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 659.0 965.302439024 68% => OK
No of words: 141.0 196.424390244 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67375886525 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.44591672665 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79520812667 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602836879433 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 199.8 283.868780488 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.0856123398 43.030603864 214% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 131.8 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273544737075 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13564034196 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136085625413 0.0843802449381 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216519284792 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0143885343709 0.0819641961636 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.