The graph gives information from Annual Energy Outlook 2008 about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030.

Essay topics:

The graph gives information from Annual Energy Outlook 2008 about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030.

The given line graph clearly presents the quantity of fuel consumption in U.S. during the period of 50 years in 1980 to 2030. The 6 mentioned fuels include petrol and oil, natural gas, coal, nuclear, solar or wind, and hydropower. Overall, it is evident that there are 2 general trends: an upward and a downward.
In detail, it can be explained that the trend of petrol and oil has been upward. There has been a gradual increase in the number of those from 35 quadrillion units in 1980 to 50 quadrillion units in 2030. Similarly, there has been a moderately rise in the quantity of solar or wind and natural gas consumption, or at 20 quadrillion units to 25 quadrillion units in 1980 to 2030.
Finally, it is compelling that the trend of nuclear, coal, and hydropower experienced the constant trend. There was stable at 5 quadrillion units throughout the period of 50 years

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-15 Kien Vu 78 view
2019-12-23 Jass Rai 78 view
2019-12-03 Sakil 78 view
2019-11-01 mohammad.iraf 78 view
2019-11-01 mohammad.iraf 78 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 232, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('moderately') instead an adjective, or a noun ('rise') instead of another adjective.
...nits in 2030. Similarly, there has been a moderately rise in the quantity of solar or wind and na...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 179, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... units throughout the period of 50 years
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, similarly, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 724.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7012987013 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74978341348 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 206.1 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.6227039956 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0809655020697 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0342336455781 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494118173278 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0508437760133 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363696312758 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.