the graph shows the number of road accidents in Nakhorn Ratchasima in 2003
The graph displays the amount of road accidents in Nakhorn Ratchasima, measured in 0 to 100 over a period of months, including from February to December, Overall it can be seen that the trend of accidents fluctuated wildly throughout the period, especially, the term of accidents had a moderate increase during May through the end of period.
As far as the number of accidents of route concerned, There was a steep growth from 30 in February to 90 in April, and sank by 65 in May. In the next four months, the trend remained unchanged under 30, followed by a period of a dramatic rise. In addition, Between August and October there was a significant increase to 50, but then stabilized to November. At the end of period, the number of accidents of Na Nakhorn Ratchasima road rose drastically to 80.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | trinhthanh1 | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
- percentage of free-time spent with family form 1950 to 2000 67
- the following diagram shows the percentage of each region s male and female population aged over fifteen who can read and write 84
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening course at an adult education centre in year 2009. The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants. 73
- percentage of tourists to England who visited Brighton attractions 61
- The graph gives information from Annual Energy Outlook 2008 about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ned, There was a steep growth from 30 in February to 90 in April, and sank by 65 ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, then, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 659.0 965.302439024 68% => OK
No of words: 141.0 196.424390244 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67375886525 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.44591672665 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79520812667 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602836879433 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 199.8 283.868780488 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.0856123398 43.030603864 214% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 131.8 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273544737075 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13564034196 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136085625413 0.0843802449381 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216519284792 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0143885343709 0.0819641961636 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.