The graph shows the percentage of households with different kinds of technology in the UK from 1997 to 2001
The line graph illustrates the changes and differences in the proportion of families with five kinds of technological aspects in the UK, over a four-year period between 1997 and 2001. Overall, what stands out from the graph is that there were upward trends in all researched categories. Noticeably, CD Player constantly dominated the technology market over the period.
In particular, when it comes to CD Player and Computer, the given graph witnessed considerable increases from 60%, 40% to 80%, 70% respectively in the percentage of households, which continuously accounted for the highest numbers. Regarding Telephone Cells, the figure stood at about 15% in 1997, then grew dramatically by 55% without fluctuations in 2001.
Meanwhile, in terms of DVD Players, the proportion of households declined slightly from approximately 25% in 1997 to 20% in the next year, then rose back to 25% in 1999. At this point, there was a significant growth of 30% in the figure in 2001, which occupied the smallest percentage. Concerning Internet, the graph experienced a upward fluctuation from 10% to roughly 55% in 2001, which consecutively constituted the lowest percentages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 329, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...cerning Internet, the graph experienced a upward fluctuation from 10% to roughly ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, then, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 985.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35326086957 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16981104045 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652173913043 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4668491871 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.125 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344489371413 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117898619103 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0934853828435 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202013223862 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0800732091163 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.