The bar chart illustrates the information about the proportion of men and women who were employed as the Academic Staff in different departments in university in the given year 2012.
Overall, it is clear from the chart that engineering, business, law and Science were the most popular among male Academic Staff while, the proportion of female academic faculties were interested in Arts, educational and medicine.
On the one hand, the figure for engineering faculty was around 80% and it is marked as the highest in the graph whereas, science and business were seen as similar figures in the graph among male academic Staff. Furthermore education was the least popular faculty
amongest male stay with well over 20%.
In contrast, the most popular faculty for female staff was education (just under 80%) while, well under 60 percent female academic staff work in the arts department and this figure was 10% higher than males moreover, the percentage of female tutor of medicine department was a similar as the figure of male academic staff.
- The bat chart below gives information about vehicle ownership in China Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information 69
- The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of major university in 2012. 67
- As countries develop people tend to buy more and more cars Do you thing the advantages for the individual outweigh the disadvantages for the environment 89
- The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of major university in 2012. 91
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online. Is this a positive or negative development? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 212, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...in the graph among male academic Staff. Furthermore education was the least popular faculty...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 263, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... education was the least popular faculty amongest male stay with well over 20%. ...
^^^^
Line 8, column 148, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arts'' or 'art's'?
Suggestion: arts'; art's
...rcent female academic staff work in the arts department and this figure was 10% high...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, well, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 879.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14035087719 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58811408757 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53216374269 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.3250298329 43.030603864 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 175.8 112.824112599 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.2 22.9334400587 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 5.23603664747 229% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331135986465 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173159239479 0.103423049105 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563588044602 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167623474446 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656432041141 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 13.2329268293 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.97 61.2550243902 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.3012195122 161% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 11.4329268293 179% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.