The bar diagram shows the percentage of male and female faculties in different streams, within a university. Although the overall number of male and female faculties are almost the same, the ratio varies considerably when departmentwise data are checked.
Engineering and education are the streams which show largest discrepancy in the ratio of male and female staffs. In education the female staffs are almost three times that of male staffs, whereas, in engineering the male staffs are approximately four times that of female staffs.
Medicine stream has a good trend of having almost same number of female and male faculties. However, the streams like arts and law are also maintaining comparitively good ratio with more female staffs in arts and more male staffs in law.
Business and science streams have an approximate 1:2 ratio with more number of male faculties.
- Recycling proportion from 1982 to 2010 67
- The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a major university in 2012. 56
- Rising University fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates have led some people to say that universities should not teach arts subjects, like philosophy and history, and only offer practical degree courses that maximize chances of employment. To 67
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where r 84
- Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy things we really do not need. Others say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives. Which viewpoint do you agree with? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 49, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'show the largest'.
Suggestion: show the largest
...ing and education are the streams which show largest discrepancy in the ratio of male and fe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 742.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 140.0 196.424390244 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.43979062825 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74434483464 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 69.0 106.607317073 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492857142857 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.8008528649 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263471057829 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140708682851 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672835593821 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16071707467 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078555975848 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.