The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of major university in 2012.

The bar chart illustrates the academic staff percentage in faculties of a major universities by its gender in the year 2012. The popular subject are Arts, Business, Education, Engineering, Law, Medicine and Science.
Above 80% of the faculties in engineering colleges are men. Business and science men staff are over 60% in their academic. Followed by marginally 60% of men staff are in law colleges. Whereas arts, medical and education men staff members have less majorities than of female staff.
However, female staff have slightly under 80% of the academic staff percentage in education faculties. Arts and medical college also share nearly 60 academic staff in the year 2012. The report suggest that business, law and science college share more than half of the female percentage as compared to men share.
To recapitulate, recruitment of female staff is below 20% in engineering colleges. Men's rate of percentage is least in education purpose nearly 20% of the total. Medical universities share approximately same percentage of share for men and women.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 243, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun majorities is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...al and education men staff members have less majorities than of female staff. Howev...
^^^^
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'suggests'.
Suggestion: suggests
...emic staff in the year 2012. The report suggest that business, law and science college ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28402366864 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85504031638 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520710059172 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.9507023426 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.4166666667 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0833333333 22.9334400587 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.16666666667 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310327749159 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122108809347 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101119848925 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201400017226 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495791931499 0.0819641961636 60% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.75 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.