The line graph compares the relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugar and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009, a period of 31 years.
From the data of Bureau of labor statistics, the highest price change was from fresh fruits and vegetables. This was far higher than sugar and sweets and carbonated drinks which were below consumer price index which was around 210 consumers.
Before 2009, the price changes of fresh and fruits and vegetables got over 300 consumers and on the other hand, sweets and sugar and carbonated drinks catched up in around 200 consumers and more or less 155 consumers. It can clearly be seen from the graph, only fresh fruits and vegetables that experience repeated significant increases and decreases whilst the others have only got a small decrease and increase and were more often stable. Consumer price index was always increased every year since 1979 until 2009.
- some people believe that it is good to do multiple jobs,while others believe that it is better to focus on one job?Do you agree or disagree?I 67
- Problem and benefits for high school students studying play and work of theaters written centuries ago. Discuss and use your own examples. 80
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 55
- Parents should be held legally responsible for children’s act. What is your opinion? 75
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading. To what extent do you agree? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, more or less, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 6.8 265% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 784.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09090909091 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34090683935 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597402597403 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2821845135 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.666666667 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.427799519749 0.215688989381 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.224522705554 0.103423049105 217% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.199497527989 0.0843802449381 236% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.355515546356 0.15604864568 228% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.208155302267 0.0819641961636 254% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.