The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London.
The graph illustrates the numbers of passengers in London’s Underground Station during a day.
Overall, the data represented on the graph indicates that the number of passengers in underground station in London fluctuates throughout the day. Major fluctuations last 4 hours and they clearly occur twice a day. Firstly one is revealed in the morning between 6 to 10 am and the second begins at 16 pm and ends in 20 pm. In fact both follow almost the same pattern which is an upward trend until the number of passengers peaks then falls dramatically hitting a low-point. Only the first one has a higher number of passengers than the second after hitting the lower-point. Unlike these periods, the middle of the day has a slightly less change in the numbers of passengers , meaning that the difference between the highest and lowest point is lower than in first two mentioned periods. In contrast to these trends at the end of the day the numbers of people passing through the station are relatively stable.
The graph indicates that from 6 o’clock the number rises three times from the number of 100 passengers during the next two hours. When it reaches the peak it drops significantly until the end of the following two hours counting little less than 200 people. Similar trend spreads from 16 to 20 pm. Number increasingly rises to 18 pm only it hits the highest point of little under 400 passengers. After that it rapidly falls to the number of 125. From 10 am the number slightly grows to 200 in one hour and grows rapidly by the end of the second, then slowly until 14 o’clock. Finally it has a major decrease of the passengers number to 100. Conversely, in the last two hours from 20 to 22 pm the number rise slowly from 125 to little above 150 just to have a slightly decrease to the number of 145.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-03 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London. 67
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015. 78
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London. 56
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London. 67
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 674, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...less change in the numbers of passengers , meaning that the difference between the...
^^
Line 9, column 136, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...0 passengers during the next two hours. When it reaches the peak it drops significan...
^^^^
Line 9, column 401, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t point of little under 400 passengers. After that it rapidly falls to the number of ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 587, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...ond, then slowly until 14 o'clock. Finally it has a major decrease of the passenge...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 768, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
...om 125 to little above 150 just to have a slightly decrease to the number of 145.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, firstly, if, second, then, in contrast, in fact, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 33.7804878049 178% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 965.302439024 156% => OK
No of words: 322.0 196.424390244 164% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68633540373 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66014724483 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 106.607317073 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465838509317 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 424.8 283.868780488 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3920625662 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3125 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6875 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 3.70975609756 323% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32622491846 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133320833814 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.160002523994 0.0843802449381 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.335567841419 0.15604864568 215% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.172008838114 0.0819641961636 210% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.