The bar graph gives detailed information about how many mobile phones of five different brands were sold over a period of 5 years. Looking more closely at the chart, it is obvious from the data that there are considerable discrepancies in market sales in each brand.
According to the chart, there was an upward trend in the sales of Samsung and Apple in the period. Samsung could sell mobile phones at 225 million units in 2009. In 2013, the sales of Samsung's phone were twice from the beginning, while Apple sales were approximately 150 million units which were more than those in 2009 by sevenfold.
Nokia and LG worldwide market sales, nevertheless, decreased in this period. In the first three years, Nokia's sales were above 400 million units, but the sales dropped to half of the starting sales by 2013. Unlike Nokia, LG market sales declined slightly from 120 at the beginning to 90 million units sold at the end. It is interesting to note that the change of ZTE's sales was almost the same at around 85 million units sold.
- The graph below shows the total value of exports and the value of fuel food and manufactured goods exported by one country from 2000 to 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 88
- The table shows the tourist numbers and tourist spending in five countries in 2012 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 83
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010
- The graph shows the worldwide market of the mobile phone market for sales in the years 2009 and 2013. 78
- The diagram below shows the production of electricity using a system called Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC).Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.Write at least 150 words. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, nevertheless, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 855.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72375690608 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38250340117 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596685082873 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9507773292 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268141600825 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11079839144 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407580313614 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175248671251 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00632253910457 0.0819641961636 8% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.