The graphs below show the annual spending of a particular UK university from 1981 to 2001
The given pie charts well compare the proportion of expenditure by each category (furniture and equipment, teachers’ salary, other staff’s salary, resources, and insurance) in the British university in 3 different years (1981, 1991, and 2001). Overall, it is noticeable that the amount of money in teachers’ salary was considered the highest in mentioned years.
In detail, it can be explained that although the proportion of money spent in teachers’ salary fluctuated between 40% and 55%, it was accounted the highest throughout 20-year period. However, declining from 33% in 1981 to 23% in 1991, the percentage of expense in other staff’s salary dipped to 18% in 2001. Similarly, the proportion of resources also decreased by 5% from 1981 to 2001. On the other hand, the figure of insurance rose slightly from 2% to 8% two decades later. Finally, it is compelling that the figure of furniture and equipment dropped from 15% in 1981 to 7% in 1991 and then grew significantly to 24% in 2001.
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later, and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 84
- Scientists predict that humans will speak the same language in the future. Do you think it is a positive or negative development? ?? 11
- homeschooling 89
- The bar chart shows the number of visitors to three London Museums between 2007 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Some parents buy their children a large number of toys to play with. What are the advantages and disadvantages for the child of having a large number of toys?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experie 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, similarly, so, then, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 853.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1696969697 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.095516471 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569696969697 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7875302362 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.857142857 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2857142857 5.23603664747 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159010306333 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853046251047 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672134959732 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122083866808 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506738477258 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.