The graphs below show the cinema attendance in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Given are the table and the line graph depicting movie theater attendance and its average value by various age groups in Australia from 1996 to 2000.
Perceptibly, the proportion of people who attended the cinema witnessed a gradual increase, while the reverse was true for the frequency volume. Additionally, a similar trend of fluctuating over the years was experienced by all age groups' figures.
Regarding all age groups’ cinema visits, there was a leap in the percentage of movie theater visitors, from 62% in 1996 to 72% in 1997, followed by a slight decrease to 70% in 1999 before an increase back to 72% at the end of the period. In contrast, the frequency figure experienced a consistent fall from 10.3 in 1996 to 8.3 in 2000.
It’s noticeable from the line graph that the two youngest age groups constituted the highest value in the surveyed years, varying around 14 - 22 during the period before reaching approximately 17 in 2000. Similarly, the others’ volume fluctuated around 10 - 20 from 1996 to 1999 before steadily decreasing to roughly 14 in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-21 | nvtrung309 | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-29 | nhattram39 | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-29 | nhattram39 | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-29 | nhattram39 | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-29 | nhattram39 | 78 | view |
- the bar chart gives information about the railway system in six cities in europe 61
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think that school time should be used for learning important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 84
- The two tables below show the number of international students from different resource countries in Canada and the USA in two school years 78
- The map shows how coastal land develops into a coastal park 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the table and the line graph depicting ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, similarly, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 895.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97222222222 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80315109835 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594444444444 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0064552183 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.857142857 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250211441383 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115426412313 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620925600882 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158766233029 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616837888426 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.