The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in Towns A and B in two years 1960 and 2010

The pie charts compare the proportion of workers employed in three different sectors in Town A and Town B in 1960 and 2010.

Overall, in town A, service-related jobs became more popular than other sectors and made up the biggest percentage, in 2010. Whereas, despite the growth of jobs in the service and sales sectors, the percentage of people working in manufacturing jobs dropped significantly but still represented the majority of jobs in Town B over the given period of time.

In 1960, the proportion of manufacturing-related jobs in town A was 41%, while the service and sales occupied lower percentage, at 29% and 30% respectively. After 5 decades, 64% people lived in town A worked as a service workers which increased substantially while the number rate of manufactures and sales sectors halved to 16% and 20%.

In town B, the rate of jobs related to manufacturing still accounted for a large proportion in spite of a considerable decline of nearly 20%. Additionally, sales-related jobs witnessed a marginal increase, from 20% to 22% in 2010. The percentage of service related jobs also rose from 10% in 1960 to 25% in 2010.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...jority of jobs in Town B over the given period of time. In 1960, the proportion of manufact...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'worker'?
Suggestion: worker
...ple lived in town A worked as a service workers which increased substantially while the...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, whereas, while, in spite of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 952.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98429319372 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24708648265 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523560209424 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6698409785 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267562296127 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133292231966 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0957859936681 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196633719227 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0979085594313 0.0819641961636 119% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.