The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period.
The given line charts give facts and figures on the enrolments of pupils compartmentalised into two categories: overseas students and local one. The graphs show the outcome of the survey taken in Australian universities for a period of ten years, initiating in 2001 and culminating in 2010.
In general, a glance at the graphs reveal that notwithstanding some variations available, the tendency of students studying aboard together with that trend of local students experiences an upswing over ten-year timeline
To start from scratch, as it can be seen from the blow-by-blow account of the numerical data shown in the first graph, the total overseas pupils enrolled in universities was in the vicinity of 20000 students in 2001. Surprisingly, with the undiminished rise year after year, in 2010 this total number worked out to 80000 students. What's more, have a look at the commencing number from 2001 to 2008, there was a fractional upturn up to 15000 students.
On the flip side, one particularly attention-grabbing fact highlighted in the second chart is that from 2001 to 2007, the tendency of the enrolments of local students was on an upward trajectory. However, it was not until the following year that this upward trend broke off and after that, this number remained relatively static at around 600000 students. Additionally, when it comes to taking the commencing part into consideration, from 2001 to 2002, this trend experienced a rise up to approximately 50000 students. After that, this number decreased and it wouldn't take long after 2006 that this trend recovered.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-20 | trikhung777 | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-08 | quytnee | 67 | view |
| 2022-02-08 | mrinal | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-05 | smiley | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-03 | thaodim123 | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...al number worked out to 80000 students. Whats more, have a look at the commencing num...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 561, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...fter that, this number decreased and it wouldnt take long after 2006 that this trend re...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, look, second, so, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 17.0 5.60731707317 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1334.0 965.302439024 138% => OK
No of words: 256.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2109375 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07021310272 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 106.607317073 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56640625 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 384.3 283.868780488 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 97.5260648921 43.030603864 227% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 148.222222222 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4444444444 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.