The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period.
The given line graphs provide a comparison of the registration of foreign and local students in Australian universities from 2001 to 2010 on the basis of total and commencing.
From overall perspective, it is conspicuous that the number international students was less than the national students at the beginning and increased dramatically after that. It can be stated that most of line graphs experienced a upward trend except for the commencing number of local students.
According to the data in commencing group, in 2001 the international and local students nearly have similar pattern, with the volume of students was more than 10000 people. However, in 2002, the commencing number in local students reached peak and accounted for 23000 students while the others was under 20000. The statistics in commencing number in international group saw a growth over the years shown and increase to 40000 students. Nevertheless, this number in local students witnessed the fluctuation, which had merely 20000 students at the and and was less than 2 times when compared with the others.
Turning to the total number of two types of students, both graphs shown an upward trend. It is obvious that the overseas students was occupied 20000 students in 2001 while the others was double. Over 10-year period, the total volume of foreign student made a fourfold jump and hosted the first rank at 80000 students. Finally, at the end of the period, there was an slight increase in volume of local students, which stood at 60000 students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-20 | trikhung777 | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-08 | quytnee | 67 | view |
| 2022-02-08 | mrinal | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-05 | smiley | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-03 | thaodim123 | 73 | view |
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or negative development 93
- The pie graphs show the nutritional consistency of the two dinners Write a report to a university lecturer describing the data 11
- Bullying is a big problem in many schools What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 73
- Group or team activities can teach more important skills for life than those activities which are done alone Do you agree or disagree 95
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ed that most of line graphs experienced a upward trend except for the commencing ...
^
Line 5, column 547, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
... which had merely 20000 students at the and and was less than 2 times when compared wit...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 364, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ly, at the end of the period, there was an slight increase in volume of local stud...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, nevertheless, so, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1283.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 250.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.132 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.744620921 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 359.1 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.2795023216 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.636363636 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7272727273 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31394377135 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131653699652 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059371717964 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204195820868 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352895700694 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.