The graphs below show how people in a European city reached their office and got back home in 1959 and 2009.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The both pie chart in combination depicts, the ratio of European city’s people travelling habit to office and back to home in 1959 and 2009.
Overall, as shown in pie charts, it is worth noticing that people travel faster in 2009 than 1959, additionally, more than 50% people prefer to walk in 1959, but, in 2009 significant percent of people travel by car.
To begin with, in the year 1959, 55% of people prefer to walk, but in 2009 only one quarter (25%) people travel by foot, which clearly denote that people are becoming lazy as they got facilities. While, between both years, another significant change was shown in car users, hence it increases by one quarter (25%) than 1959. However, the bus and train users do not have significant changes, while, the ratio of train users remains constant and bus users decrease from 15% to 13% than in 1959 to 2009. Besides this, others users have significant increases in this time interval, while, it was just 5% in 1959, but, increase by 12% in 2009.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-03 | Đức An | 43 | view |
| 2020-09-19 | asmita acharya | view | |
| 2020-09-19 | asmita acharya | 74 | view |
| 2020-09-19 | asmita acharya | view | |
| 2020-09-10 | stella1303 | 78 | view |
- The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne 78
- Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult such as the Sahara desert or Antarctica What are the benefits and disadvantages for people who visit such places 73
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems to what extent do you agree or disagree what others measures do you think effective 67
- The graph below shows the amount of UK investments in clean energy from 2008 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, if, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 822.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67045454545 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33325646764 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568181818182 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.190405748 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.0 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3333333333 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178715989772 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102451117802 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795879528793 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16026441287 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0675642609124 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.4 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.