The graps and table below give
Information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries
The line graph provides information about water usage globally in three different sectors, over a period of 100 years, whereas the table shows the consumption of water in brazil and democratic republic of congo in 2000
Overall, it is clear that the basic general trend in line graph id upward for three sectors. Howeve, the table, there is huge difference between the two countries in terms of population irrigated land, and water usage per individual
In detail, in 1900, the sector of agriculture had highest figures that industrial and domestic area, at about 5000 kilometers but it rose gradually and reached its peak to almost 3000 kilometers, by contrast, the two other sectors leveled off for nearly 50 years before it rose steadily at the end of the period, at 11000 kilometers for industrial usage and 500 kilometers for industrial
Meanwhile,the number of water consumption in the table had a huge gap between brazil and congo in 2000. The former had 176 million population and the latter had merely 52 million. In addition, the category of irrigation land and consumption of water per person in congo was significantly lower than brazil with 20 times difference between the two nations
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-05 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-22 | nijam | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-12 | maiphuonganh | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | stewies | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 219, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and democratic republic of congo in 2000 Overall, it is clear that the basic gene...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sage and 500 kilometers for industrial Meanwhile,the number of water consumptio...
^^
Line 4, column 12, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...0 kilometers for industrial Meanwhile,the number of water consumption in the tabl...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0351758794 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71326073081 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587939698492 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 49.0 22.4926829268 218% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 211.891924103 43.030603864 492% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 250.5 112.824112599 222% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 49.75 22.9334400587 217% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.23603664747 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242299737897 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131047648515 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075965285699 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154039543738 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0803881139374 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 27.2 13.2329268293 206% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 61.2550243902 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 21.2 10.3012195122 206% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.84 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.06136585366 124% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 29.0 11.4329268293 254% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 21.6 10.9970731707 196% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.