The diagrams illustrate how Happy Valley Shopping Center has developed since 1982 when it was built.
Overall, once parking lot has been built to the left-hand bottom corner of the area, there were subtle changes inside the building apart from the morphing the place of a furniture store into a new and bigger one.
In 1982, the two stored building was located to the right of a lake and surrounded by trees and this building has been expanded over 3 decades. Moreover, coffee shop has been replaced to a themed restaurant, while its and other stores’ locations have been altered. Three parts of the building, however, a toilet, elevator and entertainment area have not faced the changes, but lobby area has been come into entrance.
Outside of the building has changed a lot be it a parking area or disappearing of path and cutting down a small part of the trees. Path, for instance, has been destroyed and the trees that were situated to the bottom-left of shopping center were cut. As a result of this change, parking lot has been built there for consumers.
- https://www.bestmytest.com/ielts/ielts-academic-writing/49 11
- The maps show the development of Happy Valley Shopping Center Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 79
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some touristfacilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makecomparisons where relevant.Write 11
- : Air transport is increasingly used to export fruit and vegetables where they cannot be grown or out of season. Do the benefits of this trend outweigh the drawbacks? 78
- SOME PEOPLE THINK IT IS A GOOD THING FOR SENIOUR MANAGEMENT POSITIONS TO HAVE VERY HIGH SALARIES COMPARED TO OTHER WORKERS OF THE SAME COMPANY OR ORGANISATION. TO WHAT EXTENT DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, moreover, while, apart from, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 908.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90810810811 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53522157405 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605405405405 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7108654767 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.5 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.