SOME PEOPLE THINK IT IS A GOOD THING FOR SENIOUR MANAGEMENT POSITIONS TO HAVE VERY HIGH SALARIES COMPARED TO OTHER WORKERS OF THE SAME COMPANY OR ORGANISATION. TO WHAT EXTENT DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE?
It is thought by some that senior managers should be entitled to seven figure salaries and I totally agree with this since they are the vital assets of companies with great leadership as well as vision creating and sharing skills.
Firstly, it is the only leadership skill that matters in order to guide the extraordinary performing teams which are the ultimate advantage for any organisation. In order words, state-of-the-art products or services might get the companies into the game, but only seniors can inspire the teams that can deliver victory and create a wall that is higher and harder for competitors to climb. Therefore, leaders should enjoy lavish pay as it is the one way of keeping them satisfied.
Another point to consider is that executives, yet positive ones, always attempt to see and establish a brighter and better future. At the moment, sceptics often scoff and fail about leaders as these individuals see what is positive and take the next steps to rally and unite people to create it. Steve Jobs, Mahatma Gandhi and Sir Henry Parkers always tapped into the power of a vision and found a way forward. Executive packages only bestowed a freedom upon them to do what they loved.
Finally, there is a fine line between senior level managers and other employees. That is to say, the efforts, opportunities and benefits brought to the table separate the CEOs from the rest. However, lower level workers should also get paid well depending on the amount of work and value they add to their organisation.
In conclusion, top level managers ought to receive hefty pay cheques due to the skills they possess. Nevertheless, other staff members should not be offered stagnant income which might in turn pose serious threats to the overall performance of the company.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-28 | Nicolas | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-27 | Lê Võ Nhật Quang | 89 | view |
| 2018-10-04 | honza | 11 | view |
| 2018-08-17 | drtruong92 | 89 | view |
| 2018-07-31 | eyraen | 84 | view |
- https://www.bestmytest.com/ielts/ielts-academic-writing/49 11
- SOME PEOPLE THINK IT IS A GOOD THING FOR SENIOUR MANAGEMENT POSITIONS TO HAVE VERY HIGH SALARIES COMPARED TO OTHER WORKERS OF THE SAME COMPANY OR ORGANISATION. TO WHAT EXTENT DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE? 84
- MORE YOUNG PEOPLE ARE LEAVING THEIR RURAL AREAS TO URBAN CITIES TO STUDY AND WORK. WHAT DO YOU THINK ARE THE REASONS? DO ADVANATGES OUTWEIGH ITS DISADVANTAGES? 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some touristfacilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makecomparisons where relevant.Write 11
- : Air transport is increasingly used to export fruit and vegetables where they cannot be grown or out of season. Do the benefits of this trend outweigh the drawbacks? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 445, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'freedom'.
Suggestion: freedom
...rward. Executive packages only bestowed a freedom upon them to do what they loved. Fin...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 258, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the overall performance of the company.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, as well as, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1491.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98662207358 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60421104965 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625418060201 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2662732775 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.692307692 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.30769230769 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14365491244 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0414311916084 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0307818157998 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0689062118049 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.022372715678 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.