The given tables compare the amount of money was generated by fairtrade bananas and coffee in five distinct nations from 1999 to 2004.
Overall, the sales of coffee were increased in all given nations, whereas the sales of bananas were rose in three out of five countries over the given period. However, the sales of both bananas and coffee were highest in the UK.
In 1999, around £1.5 million of money was generated by coffee in the UK, and this figure was increased to £20 million in 2004. The sales of coffee in Switzerland were considerably higher compared to Belgium (£3million versus £1million). Sweden's sales of coffee were only £0.8 million, which was also the least figure of the given table. Further, the sales of coffee in Denmark and Belgium were under £3 million.
In 2004, almost £47 million of the banana sales were recorded in the UK, which was almost eight times more than that of Switzerland's banana sales (£5.5 million). Surprisingly, the figures of Belgium and Sweden were uniform, in terms of banana sales with £1 million each. By 2004, a rise of £3 million had been observed in the sales of banana in Denmark.
- IELTS Task 1 Tables give information about sales of fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 67
- The chart below shows information about students studying in six major subjects at the US university in 2010 87
- IELTS Task 1 Tables give information about sales of fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82741116751 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32538287143 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477157360406 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7805133161 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263623978379 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132733182605 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602481538433 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197001211928 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550238664346 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.