The illustrations show two stages in the development of the mobile phone. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The image indicates the development of mobile phones in two different stages.
Overall It can be seen that earlier the dimension, as well as the weight of the cell phones, were more compared to the recent models.
Firstly, Cell phones in the early days of their invention were very bulky and at the same time, the weight was also more. The dimensions were around 130mm in height and 50mm in width with 50grams of weight. Moreover, the functions provided were not that advanced in the beginning, It has a simple black and white screen with an earphone above the screen. With that, It also has a keyboard for typing and the main center button for selecting a variety of functions.
On the other hand, the contemporary mobile phone was an upgraded version of the latter one and included all the new technologies at that time. It used to offer a full-color display with an earphone; also, the size of the cell was reduced to 90mm in height and 40mm in width. Whereas, the main update are as follows, Internet connection, E-mails, music player, multi-player games with added functions.
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 67
- The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking 73
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010 78
- The table displays the average monthly rainfall for the year in five cities of the world Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The charts below show the percentage of monthly household income spent on various items by two different groups in one European country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, well, whereas, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 902.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79787234043 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50818036914 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617021276596 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.0495976238 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.222222222 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.88888888889 5.23603664747 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0938856903597 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0449994684113 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645676617034 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0773837212226 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0806891134606 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.