Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?
What other measures do you think might be effective? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
To curb growing traffic and pollution problems, a handful of people believe that the price of petrol should be increased. Nonetheless, I do not think that it is a good idea. Instead, another solution like utilizing friendly resources seems to be more possible.
At the outset, rising the petrol price not only can not tackle the traffic and pollution issues but it also arises more complicated problems. Specifically, due to the increase in oil price, the price of all goods such as food, fruits and so on will go up. As a result, the demand for buying things of costumers will decrease, which has bad effect on the national economy.
Therefore, I suggest taking advantage of sustainable energy like solar power, wind power to solve the problems. Obviously, if the government and corporations focus on using solar energy for public transportation such as trams, buses, and so on, the number of citizens travelling will go up. Moreover, utilizing these energy sources will minimize the amount of CO2 and CFC in the air, make the air fresher.
To sum up, I do not think that increasing the petrol price will be the best way to solve traffic and pollution problems. People should consider using friendly energy,instead.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-04 | thuybeo25092002 | 78 | view |
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?What other measures do you think might be effective? Give reasons for your answer and include a 78
- Some people think certain prisoners should be made to do unpaid community work instead of being put behind bars. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Homework is a part of school life Many people feel that giving homework daily to school children works well for them while some feel it is an unnecessary burden on them What do you think about it Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examp 82
- Talk about the importance of fresh water to life and offer your own solutions to preserve this very valuable natural resource. 61
- In many Western countries, there is an increasing number of couples choosing to have no children. What are the advantages and disadvantages to couples having no children? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...resources seems to be more possible. At the outset, rising the petrol price n...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... bad effect on the national economy. Therefore, I suggest taking advantage of...
^^^^
Line 5, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lic transportation such as trams, buses, and so on, the number of citizens travel...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...FC in the air, make the air fresher. To sum up, I do not think that increasin...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 171, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , instead
...le should consider using friendly energy,instead.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, therefore, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98048780488 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78213045188 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.767706114 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8181818182 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6363636364 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63636363636 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222280210969 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0901057621584 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106111495343 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156818590689 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0918492550001 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.